|
Matrix Management: Not a Structure, a Frame of Mind |  | Authors: Christopher A. Bartlett, Sumantra Ghoshal Publisher: Harvard Business Review Category: Book
Buy New: $6.50 as of 9/9/2010 07:41 CDT details
Seller: Amazon.com Rating: 1 reviews Sales Rank: 921540
Format: Download: PDF Media: Digital Pages: 8
Publication Date: July 1, 1990 Availability: Available for download now
| |
| Similar Items:
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description In many companies, strategic thinking has outdistanced organizational capability. Often these companies make the mistake of adopting elaborate organizational matrices that actually impair their ability to implement sophisticated strategies. Keeping a company strategically agile while still coordinating its activities across divisions, even continents, means eliminating parochialism, improving communication, and weaving the decision-making process into the company's social fabric. The goal is to build a matrix of corporate values and priorities in the minds of managers and let them make the judgments and negotiate the deals that make strategy pay off.
|
| Customer Reviews: An organizational structure to cope with complex strategies December 8, 2001 Gerard Kroese (The Netherlands) 12 out of 12 found this review helpful
Christopher Bartlett is Professor of Business Administration at Harvard Business School, Sumantra Ghoshal is Professor of Strategic Leadership at London Business School. Both are responsible for the bestsellers 'Managing Across Borders' (1989) and 'The Individualized Corporation' (1997). This article was published in the July-August 1990 issue of the Harvard Business Review.All through the 1980s, companies were redefining their strategies and reconfiguring their operations in response to an increasingly complex environment and an accelerating rate of environmental change. But according to the authors "the problem [for managers] is that their companies are organizationally incapable of carrying out the sophisticated strategies they have developed. Over the past 20 years, strategic thinking has far outdistanced organizational capabilities." The obvious solution was the matrix structure with its parellel reporting relationships. However, the authors conclude that the critical strategic requirement is not devise the most ingenious and well coordinated plan but to built the most viable and flexible strategic process. Organizations most successful in reshaping the understanding of its employees has three principal characteristics in common: (1) a clear and consistent corporate vision; (2) effective human resources management; and (3) the integration of individual thinking and activities into the corporate agenda ("co-option"). The authors discuss each of these three characteristics in detail. Conclusion of the article is that organizations need to develop of flexible perspectives and relationship within each manager's mind in order to let individuals make judgments and trade-offs toward a shared strategic objective. Somewhat disappointing article on an interesting subject by two academic heavyweights. I find the problem with this article that it is too academical and lacks on the practical perspective. Yes, the authors do use examples, but these are just not adequate enough. It all sounds a little bit soo simple. I also feel that the authors do not create a great link between strategy and the matrix structure. In fact, an in-depth discussion on the management of matrix structure probably requires a full book. The authors use business US-English.
|
|
|
CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS ON THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED ‘AS IS’ AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME.
Copyright
© 2009-2010, Speciality-Ebooks.com. All Rights Reserved. | |